Was Atlantis a Real City?

Was Atlantis a Real City?

It was during the time of the Western Civilization, around 360 B.C., that Plato spoke of a mystical island that sank away to the murky depths of the sea to be forgotten.

As depicted by Plato, the city known as Atlantis was a magnificent place that allured the attention of seafarers traveling the Atlantic.

The tale of the lost city is one that has been shared for generations, but was Atlantis a real city or simply just a legend?

This question has sparked many searches over the years seeking answers to whether the island actually exists.

In fact, there have been many claims of discoveries on the long lost city that have turned up false, but it wasn’t until recent that the possibility of its very existence was proven based on Plato’s description.

With many researchers following the ancient stories about the island for nearly 2,000 years, the legendary prehistoric city would become one of the most widely known and talked about civilizations of our time.

According to Plato’s account on the hidden city, there have been countless theories regarding its validity with some disconnection to the time period associated between Plato and Athens.

The Truth Revealed About The Lost City

Researchers believed to have come across the actual setting of the legendary lost island. The four-year study that took place indicates that Atlantis was nowhere near the Atlantic Ocean, but actually in the Mediterranean Sea.

While the exact location is not as Plato had suggested, the study supports his description that Atlantis was a submerged island of the prehistoric era.

As of now, you can land on a site that gives you a real visual of Atlantis. It touches on the volcanic geology and chronology, as well as the flora, fauna, and the topography of the island.

It appears as though the Atlantis was destroyed by a massive flood, quite possibly a tsunami, which some researchers failed to mention in their findings.

Moreover, the actual study shows that today’s Cyclades Islands were linked to the Cyclades Plateau, which is currently a flat ground that is 400ft below sea level.

The islands and the plateau formed one huge island, which happens to have the same characteristics that Plato touched on concerning Atlantis. This means that the massive island could be the real Atlantis.

Does This Mean Plato Was Off Point?

Given this new insight it’s easy to speculate that Plato’s original depictions on the legendary island was not to be taken as factual.

This is in addition to science fiction authors that have come to spin their own twist to the original tale that transformed the mysterious island into a super modernized location with flying machines and developed technology greater than the current world.

All this aside, there is supporting evidence that he wasn’t entirely wrong. Rather, he based his narration on a real location.

In addition, the new location of a lost city that was discovered matched almost perfectly to Plato’s description of Atlantis.

So why does his account vary at some point with the descriptive study?

A common mistake that many seem to make when reading the translation of the original tale was that the island Plato spoke of was one that took place outside of the Pillars of Hercules.

Rather, the island was actually one of America and not of Atlantis, which is perhaps the very reason why never until now a matching site was able to be located.

Plato included some common information from the later days, which included some reports from the Minoan Era.

It’s evident that this was an era he clearly understood, which is why he used it in his account on Atlantis.

All in all, it was hypothesized that the addition of this information in his account was as a means to communicate to the readers the philosophical ideas behind it.

To answer the age old question was Atlantis a real city, it has been determined that there actually is a ‘lost city’ due in part to the Mediterranean sea drowning the island in 8000 B.C.

The Mediterranean civilization took place over the course of 10,000 years, which also contributed to the varied accounts of the Atlantis island from the original tale.

Despite the varying theories and ideas that have circulated around Plato’s lost island, it can be determined that he was very much correct in what he talked about in his dialogues.

The lost city of Atlantis is real.

3 comments on “Was Atlantis a Real City?

  1. People seem to forget that when Plato wrote about Atlantis he wasn’t writing about a place he had seen. He was relaying a story that was already 10000 years old about a place that was even older.

  2. So Atlantis was sort of a thriving settlement at around the same time as the Minoans were sailing around the Mediterranean? If not, did the Minoans come a little later or a lot later? Were they the people whose records Plato used as his sources?

    So many unanswered questions. Still, though, it is really neat to find out that something at least similar to Atlantis actually existed at one point, even if it was in a very different place and may or may not have actually been called ‘Atlantis’.

    Either way, I liked your article. Insightful read, interesting documentary, and fascinating site theme overall.

    Happy trails, friend.

    1. Well thank you Andrew – glad to hear that you enjoyed your visit here so much. I agree, it’s fascinating to find out that a place similar to Atlantis once existed and to find out more about the subject as a whole.

      Have a great day! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*