MH370 Becomes the Unexplained Cold Case

How can an aircraft simply vanish into thin air? Even after seven years later, we only have little to no information as to what and how it happened. This is not just a simple mystery, it is the world’s greatest aviation mysteries.

Can this happen again in the future?

Why hasn't MH370 been found? | Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 | The Guardian

We don’t know what happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. That’s a risky statement since air crash investigators believe in never giving up until they find the explanation.

Despite this, Malaysian authorities have shut off their investigation into the loss of their Boeing 777 with 239 onboard. That goes against the grain of every inquiry. A crash must be investigated to determine whether a human or mechanical fault (or a mix of both) exists.

This is important because flying has only become so safe since this issue has been addressed over many decades in an exacting process. Every part of planes are built so strongly with frame structure machining malaysia. Every crash was investigated until its cause was proven without question in hope that there would not be another case like MH370.

What Is So Disturbing about MH370?

After seven years with no trace, the flight has joined the gallery of ghosts. The world’s greatest aviation mysteries have taken on a new cultural dimension. This will draw many storylines in the future, from reasonable to crazy.

Clearly, this is not a pleasant place. Nobody wants to be a part of a long-running mystery. The list of casualties dates back to the beginnings of flying and contains many long-forgotten names. Most of the names are remnants of a period when aviation safety was still a work in progress. The machines were simple. Often, the risks were irresponsible. Flying has several flaws. Every death carried a lesson for the future.

No other mode of travel has caused such spectacularly horrific deaths. The abrupt, random, and brutal character of aviation accidents heightened public awareness, making air travel seem more hazardous than it really was.

The amount of risk tolerated in commercial aviation over its first five decades is considered unacceptable nowadays. Every year, almost 4 billion people board scheduled commercial flights across the globe, virtually completely risk-free.

Every aviation accident has a hurry to blame. Throughout this story, we have seen the desire to assign blame arise from a number of sources, from those seeking to avoid accountability to the affected families.

Faced with Malaysian authorities’ repeated carelessness, there was enough blame to go around. And, unsurprisingly, the victims’ relatives, often seen as a nuisance by Malaysians, were given a suitable target to blame.

But blaming without knowledge is harsh. And that includes blaming  the pilots. Pilot mistake is a symptom of other issues, not the cause of accidents. Errors are inevitable.

Air France Flight 447 from Rio to Paris 

The case of Air France Flight 447 from Rio to Paris that went missing in the South Atlantic is a case in point of pilot’s human error. The wreckage and the flight data recorders revealed an unsettling picture of faulty technology and inadequate pilot reaction. The data from a speedometer sent wildly irregular data into the plane’s autopilot systems (the system normally flying the Airbus A330 at cruise as this was).

Confused computers started to shut off. The two pilots were as bewildered as their instruments when they had to regain control from the computers. They could have flown themselves out of danger if they had noticed the issue. They underestimated the jet’s instability, and it crashed into the water.

The initial problem with the airspeed instrument was icing in extreme weather. The fatal flaw was human. As a consequence, pilots now get frequent simulator training in “upset recovery.” And the device is engineered to withstand icing.

This case ended up being a great example of how to learn from a disaster and make flying safer. It took two years to solve this case.

But one important lesson from that tragedy went unanswered: it shouldn’t take two years to locate a jet’s wreckage at sea. Most people were surprised to learn that tracking an aircraft across seas was difficult in many places. 

The same complacent attitude is evident in the reaction to the Malaysian 777 tragedy. Matter of fact, it gets worse. Flight MH370 has now become a cold case that no one wants to solve. They are just lazy. The aviation industry’s view is once again concluding that this was a rare occurrence with unique reasons that cannot possibly happen again. No point in pursuing it further.

This mindset stems from the widespread assumption among airline CEOs that Malaysian pilots were involved. Even the Malaysian authorities who originally pushed this conspiracy theory have been forced to admit that there is no evidence to back it up. With no convincing proof of a hijacking or forced takeover, there is no indication of intentional human fault.

The Changes in Aviation Monitoring Technology

What Really Happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 | Aviation's Greatest  Mystery | 4K - YouTube

Now, new flight monitoring technologies are now being installed in airline fleets. All aircraft with 19 passengers or more must be able to transmit their location every 15 minutes. They must be able to report every minute starting this year, 2021.

That night when MH370 was taking off from Malaysia to Beijing, when the last message sent from the cockpit of the flight was a soft “Goodnight Malaysian Three Seven Zero”, nobody thought of implementing this monitoring technology. Now it’s only known as one of the many unsolved mysteries that nobody knows how it happened. Or maybe somebody does. Just not us.

Check Also

adjudication decision

The Law And Paranormal Activity

There are several cases where an adjudication decision could not be reached because of the spiritual nature involved. While justice must be served, it is a trying route. In one case, the accused stated that she was possessed by an other-worldly entity when she committed the crimes under the spiritual influence of her husband. The court then had to establish whether the grounds of her statement were based on insanity or genuine belief of being possessed.